Warelock Incorporated Information Systems

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Gv7be4R57a38m5xrE/defining-the-normal-computer-control-problem There has been focus on controlling super intelligent artificial intelligence, however we currently can't even control our un-agenty computers without having to resort to formatting and other large scale interventions. Solving the normal computer control problem might help us solve the super intelligence control problem or allow us to work towards safe intelligence augmentation. We cannot currently keep our computers doing what we want easily. They can get infected with malware, compromised or they get updates that may be buggy. If you have sufficient expertise you can go in and fix the problem or wipe the system, but this is not ideal. We do not have control our computers, without resorting to out of band manipulation. n this language the normal computer control problem can be defined as. What type of automated system can we implement to stop a normal general purpose computer system misb...

 This would allow improved 'anti-terrorism' protection, but also much easier automated monitoring and suppression of dissident people and ideas. Over the longer term, inverse reinforcement learning could allow AI systems to learn to model the current preferences and likely media reactions of populations, allowing new AI propaganda systems to pre-test ideological messaging with much more accuracy, shaping gov't 'talking points', policy rationales, and ads to be much more persuasive.  https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/oXzRPoCmYkEySevj8/ideological-engineering-and-social-control-a-neglected-topic

Link   In this post I will hopefully detail my entire home network. Some of this has been in separate posts explaining single items, but nowhere do I have all of the network in one post with all the changes since last year. Here is a full shot of the rack in my house. Its in a centrally located closet which happens to have a 2ft x 2ft chase into the attic, which is very handy for running network cables. The rack itself is the 25u adjustable StarTech Rack which I've been quite pleased with.

 https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/tn-archive/cc512578(v=technet.10)?redirectedfrom=MSDN https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/04/security_risks_2.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram/archives/1998/0815.html#biometrics From Schneier on security blog:  "On the other hand, biometrics are easy to steal. You leave your fingerprints everywhere you touch, your iris scan everywhere you look. Regularly, hackers have copied the prints of officials from objects they’ve touched, and posted them on the Internet. We haven’t yet had an example of a large biometric database being hacked into, but the possibility is there. Biometrics are unique identifiers, but they’re not secrets. And a stolen biometric can fool some systems. It can be as easy as cutting out a signature, pasting it onto a contract, and then faxing the page to someone. The person on the other end doesn’t know that the signature isn’t v...